RCA No. 36
January 16
zbek civil rights campaigners claim a new law aimed at fighting terrorism could have
disastrous implications for press freedom in the former Soviet republic.
Media experts fear that the law, adopted by the Uzbek parliament in its last session of
2000, will provide the government with a mechanism for imposing a virtual media blackout
during military operations.
And the new emergency powers will force journalists to rely almost entirely on information
released by the authorities in Tashkent.
The anti-terrorism bill was prompted by August's violent clashes between Islamic
Movement of Uzbekistan guerrillas and government troops in the Surkhandarya oblast.
Last month, Uzbek president Islam Karimov told deputies that "outbreaks of terrorism are
gathering momentum". He explained that, at the present time, hired mercenaries bent on
destabilising society from the inside posed the single greatest threat to national security.
"I am confident that we run no risk of invasion from the Taleban or any other army - the real
danger comes from disparate groups [of terrorists]," said Karimov.
He concluded that the new bill would ensure the government was well prepared to thwart
armed incursions and terrorist attacks in the future.
The law establishes new definitions for terrorist activity as well as a streamlined
bureaucratic and legislative system to be enforced in the event of a national emergency.
Article 20 focuses on media coverage of any "anti-terrorist operation" conducted by the
state security forces. The bulk of this section is devoted to the restrictions which will be
imposed on journalists during the operation. It also defines what kind of material will be
deemed "classified".
Classified information includes any details of operational procedures, army units or military
tactics as well as anything which could jeopardise the operation or endanger the lives of
military personnel.
Article 20 also bans the publication of any material which might purport to vindicate a
terrorist act or serve the propaganda purposes of the enemy.
Many media experts believe the restrictions are so far-reaching that journalists will be
obliged to rely entirely on the official version of events.
Mikhail Ardzinov, chairman of the Independent Organisation for Human Rights in
Uzbekistan, said, "If you can't print any operational details or mention who took part [in the
operation] then journalists will simply have nothing to write about."
Karim Bakhriev, an expert in journalists' rights, says the law will enable the authorities to
control and censor all media coverage of military operations.
Any attempt to accurately report the sequence of events could be interpreted as a
description of operational tactics, says Bakhriev, while the ban on so-called "propaganda"
meant that journalists would be unable to present both sides of the story.
In effect, correspondents would be banned from reporting on the situation in the opposing
camp or from publishing interviews with enemy leaders for fear of "vindicating terrorist acts".
Journalists who break the rules risk summary punishments. Aktam Tursunov, chairman of
the parliamentary committee for defence and security, said that offenders would lose their
accreditation and be excluded from the area where military operations were taking place.
The regulations, he added, applied to foreign correspondents as well as members of the
Uzbek press corps.
Under the new law, accreditation is issued by the military headquarters in the immediate
region or, in the event of a widespread operation, by the high command in Tashkent.
Mikhail Ardzinov said the new red tape would provide a further obstacle for journalists
attempting to cover armed conflicts - "The journalist may well encounter delays in receiving
accreditation due to the extra paperwork -- and may be refused accreditation altogether,"
he said.
The new law reinforces rigorous censorship enforced by the National Committee for
Protecting State Secrets in the Print Media, known as Uzlit. Some committee members
are so hardline that they have been known to veto publications approved by the president's
own press service.
The erosion of press freedoms in Uzbekistan over the last decade followed a brief flowering
of the Uzbek media in the late eighties.
Uzbekistan independence at the beginning of the nineties ironically led to the demise of the
press.
The Tashkent authorities, which believed the Tajik media had played a part in provoking civil
war in Tajikistan, introduced strict censorship for Uzbek journalists in an effort, they said,
to avert a similar conflict here. As a consequence, the number of independent media began
to shrink while the list of taboo subjects the press was barred from reporting began to grow.
As a journalist with the uzbek language newspaper Uzbekistan Adebieti Va Sanyati
pointed out no one but official experts are allowed to publish analysis of the economic and
political state of the country.
By tightening its grip on free information, the government will not necessarily increase
security but will certainly hamper economic and political liberalization of the country, critics
if the authorities say.
Top
About Us |
Main Page |
E-Mail |
Search UzLand
|